Hillary Rips GOP

Senator Hillary Clinton ripped George Bush and the republicans Saturday in a speech before 3000 delegates at Chicago's American Federation of Teachers conference on Saturday.

Could it be that Hillary was showcasing her ability as a vice-presidential attack dog with this speech, especially her quip calling on the republicans to apologize to America? It also may be significant that the speech was in Barack Obama's backyard in Chicago.

She seemed to be in very good form, ridiculing George Bush on global warming, and then reminding everyone about Dick Cheney shooting someone in the face. It was vintage Clinton and if this was an audition for the VP spot, she gave a nice preview of how she can help the democratic ticket in November.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/13/clinton_gop_should_apologize_t.html

Display:


Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 5)

With all the chatter about the RNC/McCain tickets out funding Obama/DNC I am starting to eye Hillary as more viable for VP slot.

I don't know, this money thing is confusing me and I hope my worries are unwarranted.

VP or not, I hope to see HRC continue kicking some ass in Washington.


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:24:01 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 1)

Listen, I know many African American PUMA's and others who just supported Hillary that will not donote to Obama. Sure, they may or may not vote for him, but they will not vote probably vote for McCain. Even though a McCain surge from disgruntled democrats is possibly quite possible, many Hillary supporters will very likely stay at home. I probably will vote down ticket or stay at home as well, right now, I'm favoring the former versus the latter of the two. Just yesterday, I had to turn down an Obama campaign representative from North Carolina when she called me for a donation. I had to tell her that any money that I had was going to go to Hillary to pay down her campaign debt. She seemed very heartbroken, and explained that based on my demographic characteristics [i.e., relatively young (30 years old), educated (post-graduate education), African-American male, and single]that I could not possibly support McCain. Even while she obviously pitied me, I also felt sorry for her that she would be calling a Hillary supporter to vigorously support Obama the way I'd supported Hillary. I'm sorry, but that kind of passion is simply not transferable after such a personally engaging and vituperative primary campaign.

I wish Obama the best, but I'll just have to sit and wait on the sidelines. No one will be able to anything about my decision on this matter but me.


by Check077 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:36:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (1.50 / 2)

This site is  just about over the mudslinging regarding who ran the dirty campaign.  Again, support your candidate passionately, but leave the bullshit behind, got it? Get it? Great.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:48:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (none / 0)

I'm curious, would you vote for Obama if Hillary was on the ticket?

I was a big Hillary supporter as well. I thought the primary was the worst thing I've ever seen in American politics and was briefly considering sitting the election out. But I find it hard to believe that you won't vote for Obama come November if you're a Democrat. But I certainly get your anger. The Clinton's were trashed by fellow Democrats and it was painful to watch.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:56:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The "kitchen sink" strategy was indeed (none / 0)

painful to watch, as well as the "scorched earth."  


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 01:44:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (none / 0)

"With all the chatter about the RNC/McCain tickets out funding Obama/DNC I am starting to eye Hillary as more viable for VP slot"

You're a little slow but better late then never.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 09:15:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 4)

Must be wonderful, not having to listen to the wars between advisors, just to go out and rip into it.

I agree, more and more, I think, IF she wants it, she would make a very good VP choice.


"Well the danger on the rocks is surely past... Still I remain tied to the mast"...Don Fagen, Poet and Piano Player
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:24:11 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (none / 0)

FYI link is broken.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:26:23 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 2)

Thanks, I changed it to the Web address of the original article


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:30:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 5)

Thanks for passing along this information. Much appreciated. Hillary would be a formidable campaigning addition to the ticket should Obama offer it to her and she accept. And what a headline and interest booster the choice would be too. Obama AND Hillary would be all the news again, leaving McCain hopelessly overshadowed and sidelined like he was before.


by phoenixdreamz on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:32:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

she must be the VP (2.00 / 2)

as she is the only real choice, and with her gravitas that none of the other veep candidates have, her attacks will be effective and rally her part of the base. Plus, DemsLandslide2008 has it right about the money. Hillary MUST be the Veep.


by Lakrosse on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:35:34 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 3)

She helps in the key states of Ohio and Florida. She helps increase the Latino vote. She will help make states like Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia more competitive. She may put Arkansas in the dem column, and she aleady has had nearly 18 million votes this primary season. It would seem like an OC ticket would be unstoppable.


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:41:22 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 2)

argh...let's see some actual prospective VP polling from those states before we assume she can flip a state, or make it more competitive. My concern is that for all the puma-ish Dems she brings in, she'll lose a similar amount of independents or soft republicans.

That's a hunch. I can't back it up because there haven't been polls, which is my point. If I'm wrong about that, then by all means, she would be one of my top picks. (What to do with Bill is another story, though.)


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:59:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 2)

I would like to second all of this.  On intellectual merits, policy acumen, base appeal, and stature HRC is a tantalizing addition.  But in terms of judging electoral impact, we need some numbers here.  How many arguments have been waged on this site based on differing assumptions of what Clinton's appeal actually is?  Beyond that, Obama would indeed need to figure out clear roles for BOTH Clintons in his administration, roles they would be enthusiastic about.  Hillary and Bill are not neutral sorts.  And I mean that with a good deal of admiration.  They would both either be tremendous or liabilities.  If Obama is interested, if the numbers seem to make sense, and if the chemistry is workable, he should not make the mistake of trying to neutralize them.  Rather he needs to capitalize on what they bring to the team.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:22:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Better said than my own attempts (2.00 / 3)

at such statements.

I think Sen. Obama was right to let things cool off for a while - no doubt both he and Sen. Clinton needed the time at least as much as the rest of us, and the rest of us definitely needed the time.

I am really shocked that I can honestly write what I did above.  A month or more ago I would only nod to be nice and to keep an open mind about the topic, but I'm starting to think there may be a lot of logic to it.

All the other Veep options seem to be at best neutral or neutralizing in contrast to the big pill of Sen. Obama's visual hurdle (ya know, that really deep tan...).  Sen. Clinton is massively recognizable and, sure, she inspires some strong negative emotions in places but she inspires strong positives as well.  Those who she really pisses off wouldn't vote Dem under torture, anyway, and the worst case is that they would get off their heinies to vote just to spite her - and again this is likely more than offset by Republican Security Moms who were going to vote anyway but pull the Dem lever instead of Rep.

...

I'm mulling like crazy over this.  

-chris


"A ship in port is safe, but that is not what ships are for. Sail out to sea and do new things." Admiral Grace Hopper, computer pioneer
by chrisblask on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:42:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: (2.00 / 2)

"Those who she really pisses off wouldn't vote Dem under torture anyway"

lmao, oh that really cracked me up. So true too :)


by phoenixdreamz on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:47:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: (none / 0)

No, it isn't.  I know several Obamacans who plan to vote for Obama (or are at least pretty open to the idea) who have said unequivocally that if she's on the ticket they're not voting for Obama.

That's anecdotal, but it's no less true for that.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:49:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 2)

if they have - like me - moved past that.

Their Primary Anger may have been just the same as mine.  Maybe time has sealed that off as well.

I'll let you know what I hear.

-chris


"A ship in port is safe, but that is not what ships are for. Sail out to sea and do new things." Admiral Grace Hopper, computer pioneer
by chrisblask on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:59:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

My Obamacan friends have hated Hillary for more than a decade.  Nothing I know of will cool that hate.  It's not entirely rational, but it's there.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:15:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

What do you think?  Should Hillary be on the ticket?


Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:30:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

I've said many times I would accept it, but I initially would have counseled against it.  Now?  I'd still accept it and I'm less inclined to counsel against it.

We do need to know how real the damage to independents and Obamacans having her on the ticket would be.  If it's huge, Obama should be reluctant to pick her.

If she helps more than hurts, fantastic.  If she hurts more than helps, watch out.  This can be polled and it needs to be.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:35:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

Thanks for sharing.


Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:38:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

Do you agree that the ups/downs of her as Veep need to be quantified and acted upon?


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:41:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

Just returned from taking the dogs out for a walk.  
I think there are a significant number of Dems (millions) who have yet to commit to Obama's campaign.  I think putting Hillary on the ticket will assist in getting more Dems to vote for Obama.
Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:24:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

You didn't answer my question.

Do you think we need actual data to sort this out?  If you're right then I'll support your position.  It only makes sense to poll this, though.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:26:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

I've posted the data I think is pertinent eslewhere on this site.  For you, I will now search it again.
Gimme a minute.
Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:35:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl e/0,9171,1821662,00.html
Millions of Dems have yet to support Obama.  If he get Dems to show up for him in November, he will get elected.
Sorry for the delay.  My personal laptop has just frozen.  I'm trying to run a virus scan.
I'm now on my biz laptop, which is/maybe  monitored.

Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:59:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

That's because they're Republicans who have bought into all of the anti-Clinton venom the right-wing media has spewed for the last 20 years. People who hold onto that much Clinton-hatred are never going to be a strong supporter of the Democratic party and their opinions should not be our main concern.

We need to care about the people who will support the Democratic party and Democratic principles -- not just for this election, but for every election for every office, for as long as our nation and these particular political parties exist.

(Besides, plenty of these "Obamacans" are just looking for an excuse to return to the GOP fold, and this is just a convenient one. Even if Clinton isn't on the ticket, they'll find other excuses as we get closer to November.)


by LakersFan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:44:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

I disagree.  We need to appeal to both groups.

Obamacans are very real.  Dismiss them at your (and our) peril.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:44:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

the way the concerns are dismissed of HRC supporters? well, at least your "concern" is noted


by zerosumgame on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:00:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

Wow.  A truly vapid and damned-near meaningless reply.  

Are you an actual human being or some kind of script?  If you're a script that's cool, but if you're a human you are basically wasting your life with posts like that.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:05:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

Are you an Obama robot? Please try to use the brain a bit. Obama has done nothing for Hillary's supporters except to piss them off.
Speaking of truly vapid and meaningless remarks.
by Marjoriest on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 10:10:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

Sure they're very real. But they're really Republicans and aren't going to be there for us in the future when we need them. We need to focus our energy on Democrats and people who will support the Democratic party.

Dismissing the Democratic base in order to gain a few Obamacan votes would be perilous indeed.


by LakersFan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:15:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

Life isn't binary, dammit.

We can court both.  Obamacans tend to support Obama less on the issues and more on his style and rhetoric.  We can do both.

You are no more important to our victory than an Obamacan who votes for Obama and donates to his campaign.  I agree with your politics more, but we need their votes as badly as our own demographics.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:22:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (2.00 / 1)

I'm a Democrat. This election is not the be-all and end-all of elections. The Democratic party should not do anything to please Clinton-hating Republicans. They have their own party.

Republicans are welcome to join us if they want to get their heads out of their asses and get over their GOP talking points. But we should never court them at the expense of our own, and we should never let their talking points dictate our narrative.

It sounds like you have more in have more in common with Obamacans than with lifelong Democrats. Guess what? Obama is a Democrat. If you really support him, get over it and start supporting his party.


by LakersFan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 09:10:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'll ask the Obamacans I know (none / 0)

Yeah, I said this in another diary, but I know Repubs that are staying home this year, but said if Hillary was on the ticket then they'd vote for McCain.  There is a special hate for the CLinton's in the minds of many Republicans, not sure exactly what it is.  That being said i'd like to see some numbers for the sake of comfort, of how many she would bring back into the fold vs. the ones she'd repel/inspire to vote against.
Her time off and then re-entry has a new sparkle to it, so I have personally changed my VP views from initially No way, to ambivalence, to piqued interest
Democrat for the democratic nominee
by KLRinLA on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:04:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Everyone knows a bunch (none / 0)

of those.  It would be an unmitigated disaster.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 01:46:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (none / 0)

i don't know if we are going to get any accurate numbers to satisfy everyone's thirst for the answer until election night in November. Unfortunately the choice has to be made before that date. We can't always rely on polls for everything. And put another way, we can't always rely on innaccurate and irrelevant polls for all our needs. Sometimes we have to rely on our own knowledge.

If we are going to put any faith in polls, we now know that we have a very close election; possibly a deadheat at the moment. We need a spark in the campaign that will carry us to victory. An OC ticket can provide that spark.

We also know a number of things without any polls. We know the Clinton's have always performed well in Florida and Ohio, with Bill Clinton taking the latter state twice. We know Hillary attracts large numbbers of Latino's. We know that Bill Clinton took West Virginia twice. We know that both Clinton's have performed quite well in the border states of Tennessee and Kentucky. We know that the Clinton's are enormously popular in Arkansas. We know that Hillary's presence on the ticket would immediately unite the party even moreso than now. We know Hillary won nearly 18 million votes in the primary and when coupled with Obama, they combine for nearly 36 million votes. This is a nice starting point. And we know that an OC ticket would rekindle the excitement in the campaign that has been lacking ever since the end of the primaries.

We are too quick to rely on polls. Sometimes we have to rely on what we know without polls.

This election is dangerously close now, and we can't let this chance for a big victory in November slip away.


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:25:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I think she should say no thanks (none / 0)

however they are stupid if they do not ask her and she will likely say yes.


by Teacher1956 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:34:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (none / 0)

I'll join a couple of others here and say that I would like just a little data before jumping to that conclusion.  I think it's mathematically suspect to just lump all of their votes together and assume that a joint ticket would add up to their combined take (not to mention the fact that they would still have to win at least 20 million more votes to be successful).  I'm no expert, but I would be very surprised if it was that simple.


by rfahey22 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:39:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Money talks (2.00 / 1)

Her donors have Obama by the nuts; they are not ponying up and Obama needs them badly, especially if Romney lets McCain dip into his trust fund.  If you believe Gail Sheehy's reporting and Bob Johnson, you would think Hillary wants this job pretty badly.  Perhaps she thinks she could completely take over Obama's domestic agenda as VP.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:46:17 PM EST

Re: Money talks (2.00 / 1)

After witnessing their childish behavior during the primaries, I'd prefer it that some of her fund raisers keep their paws off of our party.  I'd rather not have their money than deal with a bunch of rich idiots who use their money to pressure politicians to do what they want.  Good for Nancy Pelosi for telling them to back the hell off.


No McCain in '08
by Renie on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 05:28:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (1.80 / 5)

Nancy told them to back the hell off and they did just that. The Dems are doing very badly with fundraising. Obama is not pulling in nearly what he used to. McCain tied him last month.

The netroots is not what it was months ago. Apperently they thought that beating Clinton and winning the nomination was the real prize. It's not.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:18:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

mm-hmm.

glad someone could get their netroots hate on. hope you feel relieved now.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:24:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Yea, mmorang sounds waaaay too happy.


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:25:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

yea because he's so happy his party could throw away another November because it can't raise funds. Riiigghtttt.


by Lakrosse on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:28:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

It sounds like he is happy,  making opinion based broad generalizations that do nothing but disparage the base of the Democratic party.

He shows his utter delight by first declaring the DNC can't raise money, and then saying that is a result of the netroots Deciding that the point of the primary was
A: Beat up Clinton
B: Win the Nomination

What a loser.

I am still suprised after so much time there are still "Democrats" who can't are cheering for us to lose.

I could make a lot of sweeping judgments now and say stuff like MMORANG doesn't care about dead troops or children without healthcare, but unlike him I won't go there.


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:36:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Your ability to read my mind is amazing. I have all the evil thoughts and intentions you state.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:13:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Witty reply.  Substantive, too.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:16:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

as is yours


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:22:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Where do you get off telling me what I think? I want Obama and the Dem's to win in a landslide and then govern succesfully.

Obama was not my first choice but I back him now. I do think the netroots went overboard in their hatred for all things Clinton and I do think they over-spent in the primary on Obama. Just my opinion and I am allowed to have one.

Now that Obama is behaving like I said he or any Dem would have to in the general election the netroots have not ponied up the dough.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:19:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

you went their and you're pathetic for stating that I want the Dem's to lose. I never said such a thing. You are totally out of line.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:23:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

by the way, great way to win in a landslide: beat up and trash anyone who utters a sentence you disagree with even if they are fellow Democrats.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:26:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

You retorted with some logical points, but your original statement was BS, pure and simple.

If you can't see the attitude and ideology it espouses then we probably can't come to a realization.

Instead of a "I told you so" attitude, try and act like it bothers you.

I am not the only one who saw your original comment as "reveling".

As a partisan Democrat I do find that kind of discourse disgusting and repulsive.

I also find it VERY insulting to Hillary and to America that she lost due to a couple thousand people on the internet who's worst crime was they may have chosen Obama as their president.


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:50:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I'm a partisan Democrat and have been my whole life. So up yours!!!


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:00:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I don't know why you are so mad,  either everyone who read your comment mis-interpreted you or you want to retract your statement,

you parsed it out but failed in continuing to blame the Democratic Activists for her losing.

Were we not allowed to choose in the Primary?


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:03:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I would love nothing more than to meet you in person some day. I would love to meet the guy who said I don't care about dead troops without ever meeting me or knowing me. That would be sweet.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:03:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

And I would teach you how to read,

you are obviously busted, either get over it and get ready to fight the GOP or sit around and whine how the Netroots is to blame for Hillary losing and the DNC being near broke again.


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:04:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

You like puting words in people's mouths that they didn't say and thoughts in their heads that they weren't thinking.

You seem to love strawman arguments. I never blamed the netroots for Hillary losing. I think they made a bad judgement on the horse to back but it doesn't matter now because we have our nominee.

I'm not retracting anything. My point was that the netroots went all out in the primaries as if it was the big prize and that they are not donating like they were. That is a FACT.

I hope every Dem and progressive gives as much as they can so we have as big a mandate as we can get. If we lose or barely win then I will be very disappointed in the netroots if donations don't pick up. Obama will be moving to the center on more issues but he still needs more dough.

The race for the presidency might not ever be this easy again and we are up by a couple of points. Where is all the notroots money? I thought there was going to be a 50 state strategy. Senate and house candidates need money but aren't getting much. Where's the enthusiasm?

Oh, I forgot, If I mildly critisize the netroots you'll accuse me of not caring if the troops die rather inartfully.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:29:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I think it's just as easy to blame Clinton for dragging the primary out as it is to blame the netroots for "backing the wrong horse". The fact is, it was a long, expensive primary and we're in a tough economy. I don't think money problems at this time are an indication that there isn't enthusiasm. And if Hillary had won, we'd have started out June negative 20 million instead of positive 30. I also question your judgment about whether the party "backed the wrong horse" when Obama is ahead of McCain so consistently in many swing states and putting the Republicans on defense in so many places.


by glopster on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 01:42:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Are you sure you want to say I don't care about dead troops buddy? You don't even know me and you slandered me pretty good.

I would watch what the hell you say pal!


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:58:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I did no such thing, as I tried to state, I could say that but I didn't, why because it's untrue and rediculous projection.

Which would be no different then the statement you made.

Please read my comments and every other persons, your comment celebrated the perception that Dems fundraising hurt, then you blamed it on everyone.

You say we wasted too much money in the Primary?   What did you have to say when pragmatists like me were begging HRC to drop out before PA, but didn't and WE WASTED WELL OVER 30 MILLION DOLLARS


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:01:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I'm not happy at all that some people are so naive that they believed every sentence Obama uttered and now that he's tacking to the right many of them have stopped giving him money when he needs it most.

I wan't Obama to win inspite of his primary performance and inspite of some of his supporters overly agressive behaviour.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:30:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I don't have netroots hate at all. Don't shoot the messenger.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:11:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

It follows that, one must have a message to be considered a messenger.


Unseen, in the background, Fate was quietly slipping the lead into the boxing glove.
by fogiv on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:21:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

my message is that the netroots were a great regular season team but now that the real playoffs have begun they aren't ready for prime time. That can change and I hope it does but right now McCain is matching Obama in fundraising.

The Republicans are as popular as cancer, they're running a corpse and he's keeping up with Obama in fundraising and the polls. If this is the best the netroots and progresives can do after 7 years of Bush then I'm extremely underwhelmed. That's my message.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:36:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I wasn't aware that the netroots was soley responsible for democratic fundraising.  Who knew?

Also, let's consider how much democratic $$ has been funneled into retiring Hillary's MASSIVE campaign debt.  Since Obama clinched the nomination, I've donated to Hillary and to downticket senate and house candidates.  I'll be continuing my monthly Obama donation come August.


Unseen, in the background, Fate was quietly slipping the lead into the boxing glove.
by fogiv on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:47:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

who said they were. You love strawman arguments. The netroots aren't donating like they were. That is a quantifiable fact. Why do some people have trouble with the truth?


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 09:01:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

You read the second paragraph of my comment right?  Talk about strawman.  Delicious irony you got there.


Unseen, in the background, Fate was quietly slipping the lead into the boxing glove.
by fogiv on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 11:33:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Except that Hillary would be doing far worse financially at this point.  She would have had to pay off her debt and most of her donors had already given her the maximum.  She wouldn't have gotten many of the small donation donors that we're available to Obama.  Many of those people had never given money to a political campaign before and may never again.

It seems that you're confusing Obama's fundraising with that of the DNC's.  In that case you are partially right, the DNC would have brought in a lot more money from Clinton donors, than what they have to work with now.


by Tenafly Viper on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:44:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

It is a fact that the netroots aren't donating like the were to Obama or any Dem. I'm aware of the DNC's trouble. It may be that Obama has sucked all the donations from the DNC. But it is a fact that the netroots donations have gone way down.

McCain tied Obama at about $22M last month. A 50% drop off for Obama. My point was right on target and correct. Kos gave his site over to the Obama cause and even he states that he will withhold his contribution to Obama because of a meaningless vote in the senate.


by mmorang on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 09:08:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

I honestly don't care what Kos does and he is in no way the spokesman for the netroots.  

I was referring to the fact that historically the period immediately after a primary (and it would especially be true of such a contested primary) there is a lag in enthusiasm up until the convention.  22,000 is a respectable amount.  If Obama hadn't set the bar so high during the primary - breaking all fund-raising expectations, we wouldn't even consider it a lag.

The concentration has been on down ticket races, which can also be partially credited to Obama's use of party building.  And since your so interested in DailyKos they broke all their fundraising goals for the last quarter.  But imo, once the convention occurs the momentum will return to the Potus race and the fundraising efforts will be at least doubled.


by Tenafly Viper on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 10:01:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Kos and Huffington did what they set out to do: take down Clinton. Now they will take down Obama.

Huffington threw McCain a big bone by relaying his comment that Bush is dumber than a stump and that he didn't vote for him. She pretended it was a critique but it was clearly meant to make him more appealing. Now she throws subtle jabs at Obama. All in the guise of gently scolding him for moving to the middle. Kos does the same thing.

Of course I could be wrong, but I don't trust the motives of some netsroots leaders.


by mmorang on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

you are so naive (none / 0)

seriously, you think Obama's backers are saints or something?
Jimminy
by Teacher1956 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:36:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (2.00 / 4)

Just who do you think Clinton's big money donors are? They are most definitely a part of "our party". She is a Democratic Senator and the wife of the only living 2-term Democratic President. Her donors are the people who sustained the Democratic party for the last 20 years. Anyone who thinks we can win an election without their money and votes has a lot to learn about electoral politics.


by LakersFan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:17:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (2.00 / 1)

And this country had never elected a Democratic candidate with a beard. What's up with that?


by Jeter on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:36:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (2.00 / 1)

While on identity politics, I like OBama because he is skinny and lanky just like me.

Guys over 5"10 and under 180 lbs never get any respect!


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:46:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

What about Buchanan? He didn't have facial hair, but I think he had a beard.


by LakersFan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:53:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Money talks (none / 0)

Gore had a beard.  Well, he wasn't....  :(


Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 09:10:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"Our party....?" (2.00 / 2)

That's mighty inclusive of you.


by Radiowalla on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:57:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 3)

How about this:

Hillary rips GOP. You go girl!

And she supports Obama too!


by redwagon on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:52:12 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 4)

I'm steering clear of the Veep guessing game.  Taken outside of that context, this is vintage Hillary.  In fact, it's the Hillary I knew, loved, & respected since '92.


January 20 & sricki join with The engels in love!
by January 20 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:58:16 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 3)

That's our Hillary.  Thanks for sharing.


Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 05:56:48 PM EST

Bravo Hillary!! Go get 'em! (2.00 / 3)


by Susan from 29 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:00:05 PM EST

As a devoted, former Hillary supporter, (2.00 / 7)

I haven't been very enthusiastic about her accepting a VP position. But, at least to me, it is becoming  more evident everyday that Obama desperately needs her to go on the offensive against McCain, hardcore. I'm coming around to believe he should pick her as VP if for no other reason than her ability to distract and dismantle McBush piece by piece,  leaving Obama the space he needs to introduce himself properly to middle America.


Obama supporter working to defeat McCain.
by Rumarhazzit on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:04:51 PM EST

As a devoted, former Hillary opposer (2.00 / 7)

I am surprising myself by beginning to agree.

I don't put much stock in the importance of the  VP pick in electing a pres, my main concern is that it should at least not harm the effort.  There are arguable reasons to worry that she could be a drag on the ticket (the first black person and the first woman - is that asking too much progress in one go? [and] The Rush Republicans really don't like Clintons...) - but I don't know if those hold water.

the GOP Meltdown Effect is not going to be greatly mitigated by a potential "anti-Clinton Rush Republican" effect, imo, and if both a black person and a woman is too much to ask of some, this is probably offset by the Republican Security Mom demographic who would be swayed to vote Dem to set the precedent...

Your point about playing "attack dog" is well taken.  Like I have suggested could be the case with FISA - she could take the positions that are politically problematic for him to take...

You really have me thinking, here.

-chris


"A ship in port is safe, but that is not what ships are for. Sail out to sea and do new things." Admiral Grace Hopper, computer pioneer
by chrisblask on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:28:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: As a devoted, former Hillary opposer (2.00 / 4)

Yeah, she would be an awesome attack machine, we should know, plus she doesn't have to take the high road like Barack, that is his thing.  Yeah it could sound a little like a contradiction, but putting them together, when they actually have a common goal, and have looked excellent together on the stage, just could prove unstoppable.  Holy crap....I think I am starting to get a little giddy.... who knew?


Democrat for the democratic nominee
by KLRinLA on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:18:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Maybe she could throw (none / 0)

the "kitchen sink" at McCain.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 01:54:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Maybe she could throw (none / 0)

I would hope so, if there are any left


Democrat for the democratic nominee
by KLRinLA on Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 12:28:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the big problem for Obama (1.50 / 2)

is that she has double the gravitas.  But he should pick her anyway.  It is the only way a huge percentage of voters will vote for him.


by Teacher1956 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:37:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 1)

actually, at this point folks like YOU are the main reason I am worried about the joint ticket.

You think he is a midget, and she is a poltical titan. How is that supposed work in this scenario?

So, you will probably NEVER be happy with her in second place, and VP is second fiddle by defination.

It shouldn't be a consulation prize, or, as someone said, maybe she can just run the domestic agenda? That is just so wrong.

It's not the co-presidency, and I worry that is what most of you want who still carry the torch.

It's Obama's Presidency, and even with her on the ticket, I don't trust you guys to EVER support him.


"Well the danger on the rocks is surely past... Still I remain tied to the mast"...Don Fagen, Poet and Piano Player
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:43:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 1)

I have to agree, if I wasn't on this blog I would probably be all for Hillary as VP because 99% of her respectable surrogates are full steam behind Obama.

But with this lunatic fringe is really muddying her reputation and freezing the hands of the vetters.

When wholescale douchebaggery is on full display on Fox News by Will and his group of 10 Puma members, it is hard for anyone to push for her.

Attemted intimidation from the most lonliest people in the political game never looks good.

Oh yea, and for a HILLARIOUS laugh at the "PUMA" movement, look at this:

http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/0 7/13/pumas-party/


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:49:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 1)

We're doomed!


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:52:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 1)

I couldn't help it, its SOOOO DEAD around here I had to make a fluff diary about the "Puma Party".

I want to attend the DC one, I gotta witness this upfront.


by DemsLandslide2008 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:04:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 1)

It's a trap!
</Ackbar>
by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:11:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 1)

Not supporting Clinton for VP because of a few PUMAs on FoxNews is the same kind of stupid as voting for McCain because you don't like Rev. Wright.

Congratulations! You've become a PUMA! Maybe you're a PUMA of a different stripe, but you're pushing party disunity just like those other PUMAs.


by LakersFan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:25:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (2.00 / 2)

Actually, I would be quite satisfied with Senator Clinton as VP (though, Wes Clark is still my first choice.)

Senator Clinton I trust to do the right thing.

Her PUMA fans, not so much.


"Well the danger on the rocks is surely past... Still I remain tied to the mast"...Don Fagen, Poet and Piano Player
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:33:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (1.00 / 1)

When she is on the stage with Obama, she sucks all the air out of the room. All eyes are on her. Her speeches are more impassioned, she has so much more knowledge, and she makes him look like a schoolboy.
There is no way he will pick her. By November everyone would know that the Dems should have chosen her. Obama's ego is much too big to allow that. He could never control her, nor should he even try. She is twice the man he is.
by Marjoriest on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 10:25:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Oh, please. (none / 0)

Cult much?

Hero worshipping is a bad habit.  Seek help.


"A ship in port is safe, but that is not what ships are for. Sail out to sea and do new things." Admiral Grace Hopper, computer pioneer
by chrisblask on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 10:27:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (none / 0)

Yes, I agree, PLEASE go back to NoQuarter with your friends, and join in with the other barking dogs, howling at each other, jabbering for the scraps of Larry's attention.

My main problem is, when are you folks are actually getting out and working for the McCain campaign?

Get to it, will ya? The sooner, the better.

It's traditional revolutionaire theory, to identify the dead weight, and get them to go to the otherside, where they are an anchor and disruptive there, instead of on their side.
You would be wonderful addition to the day to day McCain campaign (from the point of view of us real Democrats)

Enjoy yourself, don't write, OK?


"Well the danger on the rocks is surely past... Still I remain tied to the mast"...Don Fagen, Poet and Piano Player
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 11:45:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

not trying to pick on you personally (2.00 / 1)

but your comments encourage the thoughts that are rumbling in my head because of this thread.

You really hate Sen. Obama, I'm guessing.  What strikes me is that while PUMAs have managed to feed their own bile-stoves and keep the Flame Burning Brightly, the rest of us really have moved past the Primary emotions.

I'll be frank, it didn't thrill me to be planning on voting for Sen. Clinton back before Sen. Obama showed he had the chops to make it, and during the primary I got really personal about it (that was a polititude - insert your own image of ranting, raving, cat-hurling angry if you like ;~).  But now I find that I don't have any lingering ill-will left in me, and looking back she has impressed me despite myself.

It may well be that with the cool-down period waning those of us Obama supporters who had gotten seriously underwear-bunched during the primary could find ourselves welcoming her to the ticket.

...

Still mulling.

-chris


"A ship in port is safe, but that is not what ships are for. Sail out to sea and do new things." Admiral Grace Hopper, computer pioneer
by chrisblask on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:54:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wow (2.00 / 2)

With supporters like you Hillary doesn't need enemies.

Like Chris Blask and other thoughtful Obama supporters who have moved on from the primary wars, I'm also beginning to see the merits that a joint ticket would have. I always thought there were pluses and minuses, but given the dearth of other veep choices out there, Hillary's pluses were mounting up...

UNTIL you came along.

Don't you get it. Obama won a very close race. A close race between candidates who had very few substantive policy differences. The VP slot is in Obama's hands. He can screw it up or make it work.

But even though most Obama supporters would have Hillary as a second or third choice candidate, the continuing bile of McCain loving PUMA's tarnishes her chances.

Back off. Or understand politics. You're doing Hillary no favors here.


Pointing to the inadequacies of John McCain
by duende on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:09:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

she has double the gravitas (1.00 / 1)

Only of McSame....


by Beren on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 08:46:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the big problem for Obama (1.00 / 2)

Nice drive-by troll rating on me, Teacher, you douchebag.  No wonder this site is dead half the time.  "Users" such as yourself make it borderline intolerable.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 11:40:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 4)

She was always good on offense, but her problem in the primaries was that she was occasionally too heavy-handed - she didn't know when to let up.  That probably wouldn't be a problem on a joint ticket, with message coordination.


by rfahey22 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:25:02 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 4)

I still hope for Edwards, but am realistic enough to realize that is probably a long-shot. One thing I do like about Hillary is the thought of how good she would be in the VP debates against whoever McCain chooses. She would totally demolish Romney and probably any other Republican candidate for VP. Totally demolish.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:59:33 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 2)

I agree, watching Senator Clinton dismantle Mittens would be a thing of beauty to behold.


"Well the danger on the rocks is surely past... Still I remain tied to the mast"...Don Fagen, Poet and Piano Player
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:06:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

UCTFU!!!! (2.00 / 2)

(Uncontrollably Cracking the F*ck Up)

Oh man, I was pretty offended by some of the stuff Hillary said about Barack during the primaries, but when she focuses that scorn on the Republicans... IT. IS. HILARIOUS!!!!

Oh Hillary-face, I love you. :-)


by potus2020 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:03:56 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 1)

SHAME ON YOU JOHN MCCAIN!
</Hillrod>
by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:12:22 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 1)

Good for her--she's a force and the Dems should use her wisely this fall.  I still don't like her for the VP but what do I know.  I think she's better in the Senate where her hands would be freer to marshal her considerable resources and strengths to pass President Obama's agenda.  Now there's a team that would be strong for progressive causes!


What is The October Protocol?
by Koan on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:18:01 PM EST

Obamacans and VP Clinton (2.00 / 1)

Inspired by a comment below I wrote this diary on republicansforobama.org titled "Would you vote McCain if Sen. Clinton were the Democratic VP nominee?"

Interesting as well is a front-page poll right now on the VP pick - I don't know if you can see it without an account so I'll summarize, and it may surprise you:

Wes Clark - 13% (246 votes)
Hillary Clinton - 15% (268 votes)
Chuck Hagel 14% - (263 votes)
Janet Napolitano 2% - (35 votes)
Bill Richardson 14% - (255 votes)
Kathleen Sebelius 10% - (179 votes)
Jim Webb 17% - (316 votes)
Other 15% - (272 votes)

It's a virtual five-way tie with Sen. Clinton in third with no negative comments that I could see.

-chris


"A ship in port is safe, but that is not what ships are for. Sail out to sea and do new things." Admiral Grace Hopper, computer pioneer
by chrisblask on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:27:11 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 3)

Hillary has been doing this for years. It's interesting that people are beginning to see the real Hillary instead of playing back the right wing framing of her life and actions that were actually used by the pundits and a whole lot of Democrats during the primaries and long before.   I doubt Obama would find a better VP choice than Hillary - comparable, maybe - I'm feeling a lot like I really want her where she is now. But if asked she would say yes. They're both moderate Democrats who are socially liberal. They both have always been strong supporters of the war in Afghanistan, so I never really got the I'm voting for Obama because he is the anti-war candidate thing. The important point is that McCain and the Republicans have this insane adherence to failed foreign policy ideas despite decades of contrary evidence. I have no doubts that Democrats will get the job done - better. Republicans = really bad economy as well.


by Jeter on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 07:33:08 PM EST

Re: Hillary Rips GOP (2.00 / 1)

Think about it seriously. 95 percent of your long term Hillary haters would not vote for Obama anyway.


"Do you know the difference between a War Story and a Fairy Tale?"
by RedstateL